City Council Closed Record Reviews
The following are closed record reviews which are pending before the City Council. More details can be found under each topic listed.

Note that closed record reviews have very specific rules for how the proceeding must be conducted and who may participate; this information is provided on the webpage describing the background on each closed record review -- click on the specific case description to find out more.

Pending Closed Record Reviews

Closed Record Review - Point Edwards Building 10

Appeal of the Architectural Design Board's approval of Point Edwards Building 10 (PLN20130022).

Proposal Summary

The Point Edwards development was originally approved by the Architectural Design Board (ADB) under file number ADB-2002-226 for 295 units. In 2005, the ADB approved an increase in the number of units at Point Edwards to 350 units, which is still below the maximum 419 units allowed by the Point Edwards Master Plan. To date, 261 residential units have been constructed at Point Edwards. Building 10 was also the subject of further design review in 2006 under file number ADB-2006-97. Currently, the applicant has proposed to revise the design of Building 10 from what was approved by the ADB in 2002 and 2006, including an increase to the number of units provided within Building 10. The proposed Building 10 would hold 85 units at Point Edwards for a total of 346 units at the site.

At its May 15, 2013 meeting, the ADB reviewed and approved a revision to Building 10 of the Point Edwards development, which is the last of the buildings to be constructed for the Point Edwards multi-family master plan development. On appeal, the Edmonds City Council remanded the proposal back to the ADB in order for the ADB to enter findings and conclusions consistent with their May 15, 2013 vote.  On August 7, 2013 the ADB adopted findings and conclusions in support of their previous vote on Building 10.  The City of Edmonds has received four appeals of the ADB decision on Point Edwards Building 10.

The City Council began the  closed-record review hearing on Tuesday, October 15, 2013.  The City Council will continue review of the appeals at their November 14, 2013 Council meeting.  A video of the October 15, 2013 Council meeting on this matter is available at this link.

At the October 15, 2013 closed record review, special counsel to the Council Carol Morris offered to prepare an appeal index to aid the Council in review of the appeal issues and the Council accepted this offer. Ms. Morris prepared a color coded annotated version of the ADB's Findings and Conclusion with colors matching the various appeals and applicants responses to the appeal issues. Below are links to the color coded ADB Findings and Conclusion, appeals and applicants responses as prepared by Ms. Morris:

Color coded annotated version of the ADB's Findings and Conclusions
Color coded Inadomi appeal and Applicant responses
Color coded Waggner appeal and Applicant responses
Color coded Town of Woodway appeal and Applicant responses
Color coded Widing and Fleming appeal and Applicant responses


Closed Record Appeal

A closed record appeal means an administrative appeal on the record to the City Council, following an open record public hearing on a development project permit application when the appeal is on the record with no new evidence nor information allowed to be submitted, except as provided in ECDC 20.07.005.B, and only appeal argument allowed.

Only parties of record are allowed to testify at the closed record appeal or submit responses to the written arguments that are submitted as identified in the timeline below.  ECDC 20.07.003.B defines parties of record as:

  The applicant;
  Any person who testified at the open record public hearing on the application;
  Any person who individually submits written comments concerning the application at the open record public hearing (or to staff if an appeal of a Type II decision).  Persons who have only signed petitions are not parties of record; and/or
  The City of Edmonds



Record on Appeal

Pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.07.005.A, closed record appeals shall be based on the record established at the open record hearing before the hearing body/officer (the Architectural Design Board in this instance), which includes the written decision of the hearing body/officer, copies of any exhibits admitted into the record, and official transcript, minutes or tape recording of the proceedings.

The official record on appeal for the Point Edwards Building 10 design review is posted below.  The first link is to all of the written materials associated with the record including the Architectural Design Board decision, staff report and other exhibits admitted into the record.  This written record has been Bates Stamped with sequential numbers (0001 to 0640), which are located at the bottom of each page.  This will help the City Council and parties of record identify and reference specific sections of the record.  A verbatim transcript of the May 15, 2013 hearing has been prepared and a link to the transcript is also provided below.  Also included below are links to the minutes and the audio file from the August 7, 2013 ADB meeting. 

The written record for the Building 10 design review application is available by clicking here. (Note this is a large file at 640 pages and 71 mb).  A table of contents for the written record is available at this link.

A verbatim transcript of the May 15, 2013 Architectural Design Board meeting is available at this link.

Minutes from the City Council's July 2, 2013 meeting where the Council remanded the decision back to the ADB from Findings and Conclusions are availble at this link.

The minutes from the August 7, 2013 Architectural Design Board meeting are available at this link.

The audio file from the August 7, 2013 Architectural Design Board meeting is availabe at this link (Note this is a large file at 104 mb).  The Building 10 item begins at 2:15 minutes into the file and runs to 43:40 minutes. 


Appeal

Four appeals of the Architectural Design Board's decision have been received by the City of Edmonds.  Each appeal is available by clicking on the appeal file number below.

Appeal File Number       Appellants
APL20130005       David Inadomi
APL20130006       Thomas Waggner et al.
APL20130007       Town of Woodway
APL20130008       Widing and Fleming

 

Written Arguments

ECDC 20.07.005.D provides appellants an opportunity to submit written arguments, and parties of record and the applicant an opportunity to respond to those written arguments on a prescribed timeline.  The deadlines for submission of written arguments is as follows:

 *     

  If you are an appellant (one of the persons listed above) and you wish to submit written arguments, you must submit any written argument by September 27, 2013.

 *

  Any party of record may respond to the written argument (except the appellant who wrote it) in writing and must submit the response by October 4, 2013.

 *

  An appellant may rebut in writing to responses submitted by parties of record no later than October 9, 2013.

 *

 

The applicant may submit a final surrebuttal in writing to an appellant's rebuttal no later than October 11, 2013.


All written arguments and rebuttals must be received by the City's Development Services Department at or before 4:30 p.m. on the applicable due dates listed above.  Late submittals will not be accepted.  The Development Services Department is located on the second floor of City Hall at 121 5th Avenue North.

As stated above, this matter is a closed record appeal, and no new testimony or other evidence will be accepted by the City Council except as specified in ECDC 20.07.005.B.  When submitting written arguments and rebuttals, please reference the specific location in the record by referencing the Bates Stamped page numbers.  This will help all parties prepare for the closed record review and during the review before City Council.  

The written arguments received by the City will be posted on this page upon receipt.  It is the responsibility of the parties involved to obtain for their own use copies of the written arguments, responses, rebuttals and surrebuttals submitted.  This web page is intended to make that easier given the sensitive timelines involved.

Written arguments will be posted below as they are received.  These arguments can be viewed by clicking on the author of the arguments.


Appellants Written Arguments
Date Received Author
September 26, 2013      Carla Nichols, Mayor, Town of Woodway 
September 27, 2013    Douglas W. Purcell, Attorney for Appellant Waggner, et al
     
Parties of Record Written Responses 
Date Received   Author
September 30, 2013   Kernen Lien, Senior Planner, City of Edmonds 
October 4, 2013   Rick Gifford, Applicant response to APL20130005  
October 4, 2013   Rick Gifford, Applicant response to APL20130006
October 4, 2013   Rick Gifford, Applicant response to APL20130007
October 4, 2013   Rick Gifford, Applicant responce to APL20130008
     
Appellant Rebuttals
Date Received   Author 
October 7, 2013   David Inadomi (APL20130005)
     
Applicant Surrebuttals   
Date Recieved   Author 
October 11, 2013    Rick Gifford, Applicant Surrebuttal to APL20130005